Seymour Hersh says that Hillary has approved sending Libyan rebels Syrian sarin

The remarkable investigative journalists, Seymour Hersh in the previous two articles in the London Review of Books ( “Whose sarin?” And “Red line and rat trail”) reported that the Obama administration has falsely accused the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad in the gas attack with sarin, which Obama tried to use as a pretext for the invasion of Syria; Hersh and drew attention to the British intelligence report, which stated that the use of sarin went not out of stock Assad. Hersh also reported that between the Obama administration and the leaders of Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar was signed a secret agreement in 2012 sarin attack on the organization and laying the blame for this on the Assad that the US could invade and topple Assad. “Under the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar, along with the CIA MI6 responsible for the transfer of weapons from the arsenals of Gaddafi in Syria.” Hersh did not say whether it’s “weapon” precursor chemicals for the manufacture of sarin included, which were kept in Libya, but it was a number of independent reports that the Libyan Gaddafi had such stocks, and the US Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, ruled “Ratlines” ( “Ratlines” escape routes were called Nazis and fascists in Europe at the end of the second world war - a comment perevodik.) for captured Gaddafi weapons to Syria through Turkey. So Hersh is not the only journalist who covered it. Furthermore, investigative journalists, Christoph Lehmann rendered in the title October 7, 2013 - “Leading US and Saudi officials are responsible for the chemical weapons in Syria” and reported on the basis of very different sources than used Hersh that “The evidence leads directly to The White house, to the Joint chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey, CIA Director John Brennan, director of Saudi intelligence Prince Bandar and the Saudi Ministry of the Interior. ” And, as if that was not enough, even in a comprehensive analysis of the evidence conducted by two leading American analysts, the report of the Lloyd-Postol, it was concluded that “the interpretation of the US government technical intelligence data it collected before and after the attack on August 21 CAN NOT BE correctly. ” Obama clearly lied.

But now for the first time directly accused Hersh of Hillary Clinton in the “rat’s trail.” In an interview with Hersh Alternet.org asked about the role of the then US secretary of state to the US consulate in Benghazi operation, Libya, to collect weapons from Libyan stockpiles and sending him to Syria via Turkey to launch attacks with sarin, which were to blame Assad to “prove “The US invasion of Syria as the US invaded Libya to remove Gaddafi. Hersh said: “This ambassador, who was killed, he was known as a man, as I understand it, as a man who would not interfere with the CIA, as I wrote, the day of the trip, he met with the head of the base of the CIA and the shipping company he explicitly.. this was understood and was aware of everything that happened. and it is impossible for someone on such an important position would not talk with the boss, on some channel. ”

In fact, it was the Syrian part of the Libyan operation of the State Department, the Obama operation organization pretext for the US to do in Syria what they have done in Libya.

Conduct interviews journalist then asked: “In [Hersh,” The murder of Osama bin Laden, “it just came out] you quote the words of a former intelligence officer, that the White House has rejected 35 group targets for the US planned invasion of Syria, granted the joint Chiefs of Staff, as insufficiently sensitive for the Assad regime (you note that the original objectives include only military obekty -. no civilian infrastructure). Later, the White house proposed a list of goals to which civilian infrastructure was included what would be the consequences for the civilian population, if proposed by the White. strike was carried home? ”

Hersh said that US tradition in this regard for a long time is to ignore civilian casualties; those. related losses due to US attacks - it’s okay, or even they are desirable (to terrorize the population and force it to submit to) - it’s not a “problem” with the exception, perhaps, for PR.

Conduct interviews asked why Obama is so obsessed with changing Assad in Syria, because “power vacuum in Syria, which would follow, would open up to Syria for various jihadist groups”; and Hersh said that not only he, but also the Joint Chiefs of Staff, “no one could figure out why.” He said: “Our policy has always been against him [Assad] point.”. This is in fact not only as long as the party, which is headed by Assad, Baath Party, was the object of unrealized CIA coup plan in 1957 to overthrow the Party and its replacement; in reality, the first coup of the CIA was not only planned but also carried out in 1949 in Syria, there overthrowing a democratically elected leader, to allow the construction of a pipeline from the Saudi oil through the territory of Syria’s largest oil market - in Europe; and the construction of the pipeline began in the next year. But then there was a series of coups in Syria (domestic and not foreign powers hands - in 1954, 1963, 1966 and finally in 1970), culminating in the rise to power of Hafez al-Assad during the 1970 coup d’état. A long-planned Saud Transaraviysky pipeline was never built. The Saudi royal family, which owns the world’s largest oil company, “Aramco”, no longer wants to wait. Obama - the first president of the United States, which has seriously tried to implement their long-awaited “regime change” in Syria to allow the construction of not only Saudi Transaraviyskogo pipeline, but also the construction in Syria pipeline, Qatar, Turkey, who also wants to build there the royal family Thani (friends Saud), which owns Qatar. The United States is an ally of the family of Saud (and ally of their friends - the royal family of Qatar, Kuwait, UAE, Bahrain and Oman). Russia is an ally of Syria’s leaders - as before Russia was an ally of Mossadegh in Iran and Arbenz in Guatemala and Allende in Chile, Hussein’s Iraq, Gaddafi in Libya and Yanukovych in Ukraine (all of them except the Syrian Baath Party, the US has successfully overthrown).

Hersh was wrong, saying that “no one could understand why” Obama is obsessed with overthrowing Assad and his Baath Party, even if no one with whom he was talking, he would not say why. They were all hired to perform work that has not changed, even when the Soviet Union disappeared, and the Warsaw Pact was disbanded; and anyone who is involved in this work as long as these people well enough to understand what really is the job - even if it does not understand Hersh.

Hersh said then that Obama would like to fill in the foreign jihadists to Syria to serve the needs of its ground forces for the planned aerial bombardment there, and, “if you wanted to go there in 2011-2013, the -” Go, go … overthrow Bashar ! “So they really pushed a lot of people [jihadists] to go there. I do not think they pay for them, but they just issued a visa.”

But this is not part of America’s dealings with its allies, fundamentalist Sunni-Arab royal families and Sunni fundamentalist Erdogan in Turkey - that the United States provide salary ( “paid for them,” as here Hersh) this fundamentalist Sunni jihadists - it is a matter Saud and their friends, other Arab royal families, and their friends. (These are the people who finance terrorists to launch attacks in the United States, Europe, Russia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Nigeria, and so on - that is, where else but in their own countries.) But Erdogan in Turkey mainly jihadists offered them free passage to Syria and takes a portion of the proceeds from the sale of stolen Syrian jihadists and Iraqi oil. But they all work together as a team (the jihadists sometimes kill each other in the process - it is even part of the plan) - although each leader of these countries there are problems with the organization of public opinion at home, to trick their public think that they are against terrorism and that this is only the “enemy” to blame for everything. (Meanwhile, the aristocrats, providing “pay” jihadists, take all the money.)

Thus, the US oil and gas companies will be processed and transported by pipe to Europe Saudi oil and gas al-Thani, and the main oil and gas market of Russia will not only be compressed to, but economic sanctions Obama against Russia, plus the further isolation of Russia (as well as China and the other BRICS countries) by excluding them from the Obama three mega-deals on free trade (TTIP, TTP and CTS) will provide the American aristocracy firm control over the world, to dominate the 21st century, as it prevailed after the second world war.

Then there was this one question from Hersh: “Why America is doing what she is doing Why do not we say Russian - let’s work together?” Journalist to interview him immediately supported him, repeating: “So why do not we work more closely with the Russian It would be rational?”. Hersh said simply: “I do not know.” He has not even been suggested - even based on facts. But when journalists are so knowledgeable as he is, do not give some plausible explanation to challenge the obvious lie (which does not make sense, consistent with completely contrary evidence against the lie of which these journalists know), and that comes from such people Barack Obama, are not they thereby - albeit passively - not involved in the fraud, rather than refute and challenge him? Alternatively, the underlying assumption is that: the general public is so strongly absorbed by the general information, as I do, that I do not need to collect it all together for them in an orderly (and fully documented) entity that makes sense? This is the fundamental assumption? Because if it is, then it is wrong.

Journalism Hersh - one of the best (yet he went so far as to say about Christopher Stevens in relation to Hillary Clinton that “it is impossible for someone on such an important position would not talk with the boss, on some channel” ), but this is definitely not enough. However, it is too good to publish it in such publications as “The New Yorker”. And the article Christoph Lehmann was better, and it was even published earlier than the material Hersh; and it is good enough, because it named names and explains the motives honest and straightforward manner, so Lehmann article was published only on the Montenegrin online and only on the Internet, rather than in the Western print media, such as “The New Yorker”. Sites owned by members of the Western aristocracy, do not publish such articles - good enough journalism. They will not inform the public about the fact that US Secretary of State and her boss, US President, are people who are really behind the attack with sarin, in which they accused the foreign leader whom American aristocrats and their allies, foreign aristocrats, intend to overthrow and replaced.

Is this democracy? Open this link via Google Translate

11 May 2016

Pushkov Power advised to think about the air strikes on hospitals, rather than the Crimea
Islamists sponsors invested in Hillary

• Assad: Europe has made of Syria "hotbed of terrorism" »»»
Syrian president in an interview with Dutch television said that Europe does particularly not in terms of the fight against terrorism, and why many European jihadists come to Syria.
• Hillary Clinton refused responsibility for the chaos in Libya »»»
During the debate in the presidential race in the United States.
• Pulitzer Prize-winning Syrian exposes Obama deception »»»
Rigging intelligence investigation in connection with the use of chemical
• The United States does not exist (Barack Obama sought to clarify U.S. goals in Libya) »»»
President Barack Obama on Monday evening, March 28, Washington time (early morning of March 29 Moscow time).
• Barack Obama appealed to Saudi Arabia, with a request to equip Libyan rebels »»»
Obama is not accidentally turned it to the Saudi king: Abdullah personally hates Muammar Gaddafi as the Libyan leader had planned to kill him.


Copyright © 2009
Новости Америки